California’s proposal to ban almost all vegetation within 5 feet of homes—known as “Zone 0”—assumes that bare ground is always safer. Yet both field observations and scientific research suggest the opposite: well‐maintained, hydrated plants can intercept embers, cool surrounding air, and deflect wind‐borne firebrands before they reach structures. Removing these living barriers may leave homes as the first—and only—obstacle to embers, turning residences into unintended “ember catchers.”

Hydrated Natives as Living Ember Barriers

Native California plants evolved to thrive on minimal supplemental irrigation and, when lightly hydrated, become highly fire‐resistant. Key benefits include:

• • Ember interception: Moist foliage resists ignition and traps glowing particles.

• • Thermal buffering: Evapotranspiration cools ambient air, reducing radiant heat transfer.

• • Wind disruption: Vegetation canopy creates turbulence that scatters and deflects embers.

Greg Rubin’s firescaping workshop emphasizes a bi-weekly deep soak—reaching 12–18 inches of soil every 10–14 days—to keep Zone 1 shrubs and trees healthy without over-watering.

Wind-Driven vs. Fuel-Driven Fires

The most catastrophic California fires are wind-driven: embers carried by gusts ignite structures first, and buildings then serve as fuel. Regulations that treat fire spread as purely “fuel-driven” overlook how lightly irrigated green belts disrupt ember trajectories. Aerial aerodynamics matter: hydrated plants with vertical structure generate mini-eddies that cool and scatter embers before they strike siding or vents.

Debunking Common “Fire-Safe” Plant Myths

Experts caution against oversimplified plant lists and highlight maintenance and moisture as the true flammability controls. Common misconceptions include:

• • Palm Trees: Unpruned fronds act as ember lofting towers—among the worst fire carriers.

• • Ice Plant: Requires 3–4× the water of natives, burns readily (especially thatch), and offers poor erosion control.

• • Junipers & Cypresses: Accumulate dead material within foliage, fueling rapid ignition near homes.

• • Mulch: Laboratory tests often use fluffed-up materials; in reality, consolidated, hydrated shredded bark (e.g., redwood “gorilla hair”) holds moisture, stabilizes slopes, and resists ember-driven fire better than bare soil.

A Balanced Firescape Strategy for Plant materials.

Rather than a blanket Zone 0 ban, integrate green buffers with structural hardening:

Zone 0 (0–5 ft)

• New builds: Limit plantings and focus on gravel or decomposed granite for access and ember clearance.
• Existing homes: Remove Plants from under windows and openings, Prune away from structures and remove deadwood, and keep remaining plants hydrated and well maintained.
• •  

Zone 1 (5–30/50 ft)

• Lightly irrigated native belts: Catalina cherry, sycamore, cottonwood, and oaks (with cleared understory).
• Medium shrubs: lemonade berry, coffee-berry; ground covers: wild lilac (Ceanothus ‘Yankee Point’), low-growing manzanitas.

Beyond Zone 1

• Thin chaparral by 40–50% (avoid over-thinning to prevent weed invasion).
• Return chipped prunings as mulch to conserve moisture and suppress weeds.

Home Hardening

• • Ember-resistant vents.

• • Class A roofing and boxed-in eaves,

• • Metal-frame double-pane windows – tempered glass are best.

• • Non-combustible siding

• • Non-combustible fencing where it meets the house.

Moving Forward with Science and Nuance

In an article in the LA Times , Max Moritz and Luca Carmignani warn that overly prescriptive vegetation removal “goes beyond what is currently known from scientific research regarding plant flammability” and risks public pushback. By pairing well-managed, lightly hydrated native landscapes with proven home-hardening measures—and by incorporating wind-driven fire dynamics—California can foster resilient, water-wise communities without resorting to a scorched-earth policy.

References

1. 1. Greg Rubin, California’s Own Native Landscape Design, Firescaping Workshop on plant hydration and ember dynamics.
   2. Max Moritz and Luca Carmignani, “California’s proposed ban on plants near homes could be dangerously bad advice,” Los Angeles Times Contributor, June 2, 2025.